On April 13, 2011, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Office of Thrift Supervision announced enforcement actions against 14 large residential mortgage servicers and two third-party vendors for unsafe and unsound practices related to residential mortgage servicing and foreclosure processing.  As part of those consent orders, federal regulators required servicers to engage independent firms to conduct a multi-faceted review of foreclosure actions in process in 2009 and 2010. Under the orders, independent consultants are charged with evaluating whether borrowers suffered financial injury through errors, misrepresentations, or other deficiencies in foreclosure practices and determining appropriate remediation for those customers. Where a borrower suffered financial injury as a result of such practices, the agencies’ orders require financial remediation to be provided.

To be eligible, the mortgage must have been active in the foreclosure process between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, the property securing the loan must have been the primary residence, and the mortgage must have been serviced by one of the following mortgage servicers:

To be eligible, the mortgage must have been active in the foreclosure process between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010, the property securing the loan must have been the primary residence, and the mortgage must have been serviced by one of the following mortgage servicers:

• America’s Servicing Co.
• Aurora Loan Services
• BAC Home Loans Servicing
• Bank of America
• Beneficial
• Chase
• Citibank
• CitiFinancial
• CitiMortgage
• Countrywide
• EMC
• EverBank/EverHome Mortgage Company
• GMAC Mortgage
• HFC
• HSBC
• IndyMac Mortgage Services
• MetLife Bank
• National City Mortgage
• PNC Mortgage
• Sovereign Bank
• SunTrust Mortgage
• U.S. Bank
• Wachovia Mortgage
• Washington Mutual (WaMu)
• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
• Wilshire Credit Corporation

As part of that program, the 14 mortgage servicers covered by the enforcement actions will begin mailings November 1, 2011 that will continue through the end of the year. The mailings are intended to provide information to potentially eligible borrowers on how to request a review of their case if they believe they suffered financial injury as a result of errors, misrepresentations, or other deficiencies in foreclosure proceedings related to their primary residence between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010. The mailings will include a request for review form. Requests for review must be received by April 30, 2012.

The third-party consultant will assess whether any errors, misrepresentations, or other deficiencies resulted in financial injury to borrowers. Where a borrower suffered financial injury as a result of such practices, the consent orders require remediation to be provided.  During the review, customers may be contacted by mortgage servicers for additional information at the direction of the independent consultant.

Borrowers may also visit www.IndependentForeclosureReview.com for more information about the review and claim process. Assistance with the form and answers to questions about the process are available at 1-888-952-9105, Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. (ET) and Saturday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (ET).

If you believe that you are eligible for the Review Program or need assistance with the process or determining your rights, we at BPE Law are here to help you with both the application and review process as well as any related proces such as making a Qualified Written Request for your loan information. You can reach us by e-mail at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or by phone at 916 966-2260.

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every persons situation is different. If you are upside-down on your loan(s), especially if you’re facing a lender lawsuit, get competent legal advice in your State immediately so that you can determine your best options.

Over the past year, I have posted numerous Articles which in part deal with Debt Forgiveness and the receipt of a 1099 form from a lender.  Now, as we’re seeing lawsuits being filed by some lenders to collect on unpaid debt after foreclosure, borrowers are saying “Wait… they gave me a 1099! Doesn’t that mean the debt is forgiven?” The answer is maybe.

A 1099 is simply a type of IRS form used to report income other than wages, salaries, and tips. The most common forms are:  1099-Misc to report miscellaneous income; 1099-Div to report dividend income; and the 1099-Int to report interest income.  Following foreclosure two different forms of 1099 are used: the 1099-C to report cancelled debt; and the 1099-A to report the acquisition or abandonment of a secured property. It is this last one that causes the confusion and no doubt will be the subject of litigation.

The 1099-A contains several boxes, one of which requires the lender to state whether the borrower was personally liable for the debt or not.  If there is no liability (such as in California with acquisition debt or following the lender’s Trustee Sale), then the unpaid debt amount is forgiven and debt forgiveness tax can be assessed (unless an exclusion applies). This gives the same result as the 1099-C. But… where the 1099-A states that the borrower is personally liable, then the filing of the 1099-A  might not mean debt is forgiven. Rather, it may mean that the lender has only filed the form to designate that an event has occurred and they have not as yet determined whether or not to cancel, ie: forgive, the debt. This is a very confusing result. 

You can learn more about the use of 1099-C and 1099-A on IRS Publication 4681: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p4681.pdf. For any of you Accountants reading this, if you can shed more light on this, please post a Reply or e-mail me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com.

Watch this Blog for further insight as this issue gains greater clarity. We’re just starting to provide defenses for borrowers sued by wiped out junior lenders and the role of the 1099 may be an important defense argument (as well as the many other defenses that may exist).  Remember, lenders want to try to get paid but they don’t want to throw good money after bad. If there is some recourse, a settlement may be the fastest and most cost-effective result for everyone.

If you’re facing a post-foreclosure lawsuit or have any questions concerning upside-down loans or your rights and obligations concerning real property, foreclosure, or any related issues, please feel free to contact me at stevebeede@bpelaw.com or contact my office at 916 966-2260 for a confidential appointment by phone or in person.

California law requires that property owners must return the tenant’s security within three weeks from the time the tenant vacates and document any deductions. When ownership is transferred to another, the former owner is required to either transfer the deposits to the new owner or return them to the tenant.  But what happens when the property is foreclosed and the former owner that collected the security deposits is gone or even bankrupt?

Under California Civil Code Section 1950.5, a successor owner is jointly liable with the former owner to retun the deposits once the tenant vacates. The idea is that the innocent tenant’s right to the deposit should be protected and that any disputes over this are between the current and prior owner, not then tenant.  There is an ambiguity being argued by lenders that this obligation is extinguished by the foreclosure just as is the rental agreement itself.  This may be held to be true where the post-foreclosure owner treats the rental agreement as extinguished. In that case, the tenant similarly has no obligation to pay the rent and so the situation may become a wash.  But the result is reasonably different where the new owner treats the rental agreement as continuing and actually collects rent.  There, most likely, the law will protect the tenant.

Despite the above-stated ambiguity, all perties acquiring property through a foreclosure must anticipate that they will likely be liable for the tenat’s security deposit that was collected by the former owner. Further, they should make sure that they have a new rentail agreement signed by the tenant if the rental is to continue.

If you have any questions concerning your rights and obligations concerning real property, foreclosure, or any related issues, please feel free to contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or contact my office at 916 966-2260 for a confidential appointment by phone or in person.

Many people are confused as to what happens if the property in which they live has been foreclosed. Most fear that a Sheriff will come knocking on the door to suddenly kick them out. In California (an likely most other states) that cannot legally occur.  A foreclosure simply creates a change in the ownership of the property. The rights of the occupants in the property are determined by what their status was before the foreclosure and now, Federal and California has made these rights even clearer.  This creates more protection for tenants and a possible trap for unaware foreclosure buyers.

Here are the current rules:

1. FORMER OWNER IS OCCUPANT - If the former owner remains as an occupant of the property after a foreclosure, the new owner must give that person only a 3 DAY NOTICE TO QUIT. The theory is that the former owner knew the foreclosure was coming so they should have made arrangements to move.

2. OCCUPANT IS RELATED TO FORMER OWNER - If the occupant is related to the former owner, ie: child, parent, or spouse, and the former owner is not an occupant, then the new owner must give the occupants a 60 DAY NOTICE TO QUIT. In theory related parties should be aware of what is going on. Even so, this change gives these parties more time than they had before.

3.  UNRELATED OCCUPANTS ON PERIODIC TENANCY - If the occupant is not a former owner or related to the former owner and is on a periodic tenancy such as month-to-month (not a Lease), then the new owner must give the occupants a 90 DAY NOTICE TO QUIT. The thought here is that periodic tenants are innocent victims who may be surprised by the foreclosure and will need more time to find a new place to live.

4.  UNRELATED OCCUPANTS ON LEASES -  If the occupant is not a former owner or related to the former owner and is on a fixed-term Lease (such as 6 months, one year, etc.), then the new owner cannot terminate the occupant’s tenancy UNTIL THE END OF THE LEASE TERM unless the new owner intends to occupy the property themseves in which time the new owner must give the occupants a 90 DAY NOTICE TO QUIT. The thought here is that while Lease tenants are innocent victims who may be surprised by the foreclosure, they contracted for a specific term and had no right to expect a longer tenancy. However, as set forth below, they may have to actually pay rent to get the benefit. Despite this however, since the foreclosure extinguished the Lease, the new owner can treat this resulting tenancy as a periodic month-to-month tenancy if they intend to move-in.

Much of the new requirements arise under President Obama’s “Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009’’ which was contained in the ‘‘Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009’’, which was signed into law by the President on May 20, 2009. California amended its laws effective January 1, 2010 in compliance. While any new law becomes a fertile ground for disputes, this one presents an interesting issue concerning tenants on leases seeking to stay the duration of the lease. The Act defines a “bone fide lease” as being a lease which requires the receipt of rent that is not substantially less than fair market rent for the property. But does this mean that the rent must be paid? That remains unclear. If so, this would seem punitive considering that a tenant without a lease would get a 90 day notice with no obligation to pay. But is it really fair to the new owner to let someone live their longer than 90 days without paying? Perhaps the intent was only to establish that the lease was real…not to provide an ability for the new owner to collect the rent. But with no payment, who would ever want to bid at a foreclosure sale? Of course, it It will be up to the court’s to decide who’s interpretation is correct.

If you have specific questions about your loans, liability, foreclosure, or any legal issue, feel free to contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or call us at (916) 966-2260 for a phone or personal appointment. We offer a $200 flat fee attorney consultation to enable you to evaluate your judgment and tax risks and to plan a strategy to minimize or even avoid them. Need help Coping with an Upside Down Loan? Checkout Steve’s audio-seminar and e-book at: http://www.stevebeede.com/copingwithanupsidedownmortgage.

While little has been done at the State or Federal level to provide assistance to upside down homeowners, efforts have been made to give greater protection to tenants in foreclosed properties. 

As a general rule, a foreclosure wipes out all leases and other rental agreements leaving the tenant in a month-to-month situation. For tenants on a lease, this can be a great shock when a Notice to Quit is posted on the front door.  Typically, state law requires the new owner to give the tenant 30 Days to vacate and if they don’t do so an eviction action can be started.  In July, 2008, California has adopted Code of Civil Procedure Section 1161(b) granting all residential tenants or sub-tenants a 60 days written notice to vacate after foreclosure.

In addition, in May, 2009, President Obama signed the “Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009″. The Act establishes a ninety (90) day notice to vacate period and grants additional rights to tenants in foreclosed properties. The central purpose is to provide innocent tenants, whose landlords have lost properties to foreclosure, with additional time within which to secure alternative housing arrangements.

EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANT is a portion of the Act which provides that, in the case of foreclosure on any federally-related mortgage loan or on any residential real property in which a recipient of public housing assistance resides, the immediate successor in interest assumes such interest subject to: (1) the lease between the prior owner and the tenant, and (2) the housing assistance payments contract between the prior owner and the public housing agency for the occupied unit.  Definition of a “federally-related mortgage loan” include any loan that a) is made by a lender that is either regulated by or whose deposits or accounts are insured by any agency of the Federal Government; b)  is made in whole or in part, or is insured, guaranteed, supplemented, or assisted in any way by the Federal Government; or c) is intended to be sold by the originating lender to the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (or its successors).  This is a very broad spectrum of loans.  A ”housing assistance payments contract” means such Programs as Section 8. 

A thorough statement as to the purpose, import and impact of the Act can be found in a recent Federal Register Notice from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (”HUD”) and in a summary of Senate Bill 896. [Source www.thomas.gov].

The Act is extremely broad and vague and has given rise to more questions than answers, it is abundantly clear that the rights of persons or entities purchasing tenant occupied properties purchased through foreclosure after May 20, 2009, will be significantly impacted.

  If you have specific questions about your liability, foreclosure, or any legal issue, feel free to contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com.  Need help Coping with an Upside Down Loan? Checkout Steve’s audio-seminar and e-book at: http://www.stevebeede.com/copingwithanupsidedownmortgage/.