As reported in DSNews.com, government officials have announced changes to the administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) which are expected to extend relief to a larger share of struggling homeowners as well as renters, according to federal officials.  One of the key adjustments to the program centers around principal reductions. HAMP currently includes an option for servicers to provide underwater homeowners who are struggling with their payments with a modification that includes a principal writedown.

As we’ve often seen in the market, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remain obstacles to both loan modifications and short sales by refusing principal reduction in loan modifications and restricting short sale contrbutions to junior lenders.  Since these two GSE’s own or guarantee up to 80% of all residential loans, they have a significant effect on market recovery.

To encourage investors to agree to principal reduction modifications, Treasury is tripling the incentives for such restructurings, paying from 18 to 63 cents on the dollar, depending on the degree of change in the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has prohibited Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from employing HAMP’s principal reducing option for their borrowers. Treasury has notified FHFA that it will pay these same principal reduction incentives to Fannie and Freddie if they allow servicers to forgive principal in conjunction with a HAMP modification. FHFA issued a statement in response noting that it recently released analysis concluding principal forgiveness does not offer any greater benefits than principal forbearance as a loss mitigation tool. But the agency says it will reassess the investor incentives now being offered, taking into consideration the number of eligible loans, operational costs to implement such changes, and the potential effects of incentivizing borrowers to remain current.

Among the other changes announced, borrowers who are struggling because of debt beyond their mortgages, such as second liens and medical bills, will be eligible for an alternative program evaluation with more flexible debt-to-income criteria. In addition, Treasury will expand eligibility to include investor properties that are currently occupied by a tenant as well as vacant properties slated for rental use. Tim Massad, Treasury’s assistant secretary for financial stability says single-family homes serve an important function as affordable rental housing, and foreclosure of investor-owned homes has disproportionate negative effects on low- and moderate-income renters, as well as communities.

The deadline for HAMP will be extended for an additional year through December 31, 2013.

Meanwhile, if you or someone you know is struggling with an upside-down property in California and don’t know what to do, our Consultation Program can offer knowledge of what to expect and form strategies to either keep the property or move on with as little financial risk as possible.  To schedule a Consultation, please contact our office at 916 966-2260. 

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every person’s situation is different. If you are upside-down on your loan(s), especially if you’re facing a lender lawsuit, get competent legal advice in your State immediately so that you can determine your best options.

The most common question we’re asked lately is what can we expect for 2012.  While we don’t have a crystal ball, from what we can sense the simple answer is to expect more of the same.

Loan Modifications - Although many web posting talk about increased numbers of people getting loan modifications, we’re not seeing this in California.  If anything, lender willingness to make changes seems to be worsening perhaps forced by large demand and lowered response capacity.  For those who do get modifications, principal reduction remains rare with private modifications exceeding HAMP nearly 2-1.  Don’t look for any help from Washington.  The Treasury Dept. will not enforce any strong procedures recommended by their own Inspector General.  Treasury says that “participation is voluntary” so there’s nothing they can do.  Even the much advertised HARP2 program which was to take effect on December 1st, is now pushed back to at least March 2012. Real help would take an act of Congress but they’ve shown no real willingness to compel the lenders to be more responsive.  With an election year coming up and the Republicans and Democrats drawing battle lines, helping upside down property owners is not on their agenda.

Short Sales - This remains the safety valve for upside down owners who can’t hang on. Between SB458 in July and the Debt Forgiveness Relief Act which expires at the end of 2012, Short Sales remain the best means that owners have to avoid deficiency judgment liability and resulting taxes.  The real challenge is getting lenders to respond, especially Bank of America. In November, Treasury rules went into effect requiring lenders to designate a “single point of contact”, a person who will act as the relationship manager for everything. This sounds good in theory but only if the designated person really exists.  Already we’re hearing repeated horror stories of the BofA point of contact not responding to e-mails, phone calls, or any other attempt to get the system to work. So short sales die because of lack of response.  And with BofA planning to slash another 30,000 jobs, it is reasonable to worry that this will only get worse. Beyond BofA, the short sale market appears to be finding an understanding of how to respond to SB458 requirements which bar recourse for any deficiencies following a 1-4 unit residential short sale.  Junior lenders will remain in the driver’s seat… at least when they believe there may be post-foreclosure recourse that is collectible.  As always, the key to short sales is having an experienced, skilled, and aggressive Realtor pushing the lenders to get the deal done. Short sales is not a place for the meak.

Foreclosures - With the lack of modifications and confusion in the short sale market, foreclosures are on the rise everywhere. As of August, BofA increased their foreclosure rate 200% and said they want to double that!  In part, the foreclosure increases reflect a year-to-date change from the moratoriums that took effect after the robo-signer scandal in the Fall of 2010. Foreclosure rates are highest in States like California where there is no judicial supervision of the foreclosure process.  Increased foreclosures are scaring buyers who fear further price drops and with good reason.  Prices are down over 30% from their 2006 highs and market watcher, Core Logic, reports continuing prices declines of 1% per month. FNMA reports that 4.5 million homes are now delinquent.  The high levels of foreclosures is also resulting in record numbers of Real Estate Owned (REO) properties which lenders take back, particularly in the inner-city, lower-income areas.  But rather than resell to individual homeowners, lenders have been selling these in large blocks to investors who will then rent the homes out.  As has been observed, this process is quickly unwinding the long history of neighborhood and urban stability brought about through the Community Reinvestment Act of the 1970’s and subsequent efforts to bring home ownership within the reach of blue-collar workers.

When will Recovery Start? - At the beginning of 2011, we thought that we’d work our way through the residential default backlog by this time.  That certainly was not the case.  Based in part of economic stress in Europe, the U.S., and here in California, the unemployment rate remains around 9% nationally and almost 12% in California.  Unless people gain stability in their paychecks, they cannot qualify for the loans needed to buy all the “shadow inventory” of foreclosed homes which is holding back lender capacity to make new loans.  Similarly, loans to new, job-creating businesses have been hard to get. Although recovery will vary by location, both FNMA and the Center for Responsible Lending agree that we’re about halfway through a 10 year process… look to 2016 for price increases to start in.  The most visible evidence of this will come in 2012-13 as all of the interest-only loans made in 2007-08 start to re-set as fully amortized loans, possibly with dramatic interest rate bumps as well.  Less visible but potentially even more serious will be the likely increase in commercial foreclosures as shopping center and office building owners run out of capacity to wait out the recession.  With those foreclosures, a great many small and large employers may get put out of business.

What Should You Do Now? - 10 years from now, people will say “why didn’t I buy in 2012″.  Interest rates are at an all-time low;  home prices are at or near the floor; and rents are not falling with the prices. There is a reason why investors are buying properties in bulk and grabbing whatever they can at foreclosure auctions. According to the Economist Magazine that recently surveyed real property values worldwide, U.S. property is 8% under-valued for the rent it generates and 22% under-valued relative to income. Don’t be surprised if foreign money starts buying up more and more property here… if they can get their money out of their own country.

For Real Estate Agents - If you don’t like the hassle of short sales, get over it.  We have a long way to go and short sales as well as REO’s will continue to define where you must look for business.  For short sales, stay in close contact to your farm areas and go knocking on doors and look for those people who purchased in 2007-08.  They need you.  The strongest agents will also build relationships with investors.  Remember, a reduced commission is not bad when the purchase price is $10 million or more.

BPE Law is here to be a part of your real estate team.  We’re experienced in all parts of transactions from acquisition to short sales to foreclosures and we work directly with you and your Realtor to help upside-down owners and anyone interested in real estate achieve their objectives. To learn more, contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or even better, call us at 916 966-2260 for our $200 Attorney Consult to learn the strategies you need to move forward.

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every persons situation is different. If you are upside-down on your loan(s), especially if you’re facing a lender lawsuit, get competent legal advice in your State immediately so that you can determine your best options.

As reported in the Sacramento Bee and various financial news outlets, on Monday, October 24th, President Obama announced the administrations latest effort to help troubled homeowners, a revised Home Affordable Refinance Program, commonly called HARP.  Two big questions loom over the aministration’s latest bid to help troubled homeowners: Will it work? And who would benefit?

By easing eligibility rules, the administration hopes 1 million more homeowners will qualify for its refinancing program and lower their mortgage payments - twice the number who have already. The program has helped only a fraction of the number the administration had envisioned. In part, that’s because many homeowners who would like to refinance can’t because they owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth. But it’s also because banks are under no obligation to refinance a mortgage they hold - a limitation that won’t change under the new plan.

Here are some of the major questions and answers about the administration’s initiative:

Q: What is the program?

A. The Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, was started in 2009. It lets homeowners refinance their mortgages at lower rates. Borrowers can bypass the usual requirement of having at least 20 percent equity in their home. But few people have signed up. Many “underwater” borrowers - those who owe more than their homes are worth - couldn’t qualify under the program. Roughly 22.5 percent of U.S. homeowners, about 11 million, are underwater, according to CoreLogic, a real estate data firm. As of Aug. 31, fewer than 900,000 homeowners, and just 72,000 underwater homeowners, have refinanced through the administration’s program. The administration had estimated that the program would help 4 million to 5 million homeowners.

Q. Why did so few benefit?

A. Mainly because those who’d lost the most in their homes weren’t eligible. Participation was limited to those whose home values were no more than 25 percent below what they owed their lender. That excluded roughly 10 percent of borrowers, CoreLogic says. In some hard-hit areas, borrowers have lost nearly 50 percent of their home’s value. Another problem: Homeowners must pay thousands in closing costs and appraisal fees to refinance. Typically, that adds up to 1 percent of the loan’s value - $2,000 in fees on a $200,000 loan. Sinking home prices also left many fearful that prices had yet to bottom. They didn’t want to throw good money after a depreciating asset. Or their credit scores were too low. Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan acknowledged that the program has “not reached the scale we had hoped.”

Q: What changes is the administration making?

A. Homeowners’ eligibility won’t be affected by how far their home’s value has fallen. And some fees for closing, title insurance and lien processing will be eliminated. So refinancing will be cheaper. The number of homeowners who need an appraisal will be reduced, saving more money. Some fees for those who refinance into a shorter-term mortgage will also be waived. Banks won’t have to buy back the mortgages from Fannie or Freddie, as they previously had to when dealing with some risky loans. That change will free many lenders to offer refinance loans. The program will also be extended 18 months, through 2013.

Q: Who’s eligible?

A. Those whose loans are owned or backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which the government took control of three years ago. Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of all U.S. mortgages - nearly 31 million loans. They buy loans from lenders, package them into bonds with a guarantee against default and sell them to investors. To qualify for refinancing, a loan must have been sold to Fannie and Freddie before June 2009. Homeowners can determine whether their mortgage is owned by Fannie or Freddie by going online: Freddie’s loan tool is at freddiemac.com/mymortgage; Fannie’s is at fanniemae.com/loanlookup. Mortgages that were refinanced over the past 2 1/2 years aren’t eligible. Homeowners must also be current on their mortgage. One late payment within six months, or more than one in the past year, would mean disqualification. Perhaps the biggest limitation on the program: It’s voluntary for lenders. A bank remains free to reject a refinancing even if a homeowner meets all requirements.

Q: Will it work?

A. For those who can qualify, the savings could be significant. If, for example, a homeowner with a $200,000 mortgage at 6 percent can refinance down to 4.5 percent, the savings would be $3,000 a year. But the benefit to the economy will likely be limited. Even homeowners who are eligible and who choose to refinance through the government program could opt to sock away their savings or pay down debt rather than spend it.

Q: How many homeowners will be eligible or will choose to participate?

A: Not entirely clear. The government estimates that up to 1 million more people could qualify. Moody’s Analytics says the figure could be as high as 1.6 million. Both figures are a fraction of the 11 million or more homeowners who are underwater, according to CoreLogic, a real estate data research firm.

Q: Who will benefit most?

A: Underwater homeowners in the hard-hit states of Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada could be greatly helped. Many are stuck with high mortgage rates after they were approved for mortgages with little or no money as a down payment and few requirements. The average annual savings for a U.S. household would be $2,500, officials say.

Q: When will it start?

A: Fannie and Freddie will issue the full details of the plan lenders and servicers on Nov. 15, officials say. The revamped program could be in place for some lenders as early as Dec. 1.

Bottom-line:  Will it help or is it just more political hype? - Market watcher DSNews.com notes that since HARP was rolled out in early 2009, approximately 1 million homeowners have refinanced their mortgage loans through the program. FHFA estimates that with the revised guidelines, another 1 million will be able to take advantage of the program.  If you are part of that additional 1 million, the revised HARP may enable you to save your home.  However, a big restriction will be the requirement that borrowers be current on their loans. For many, they’ve been told that to prove a “hardship” they must stop paying, ie: how can you really have a hardship if you’re still current on the loan? Since lenders are not at all compelled to participate in HARP, why would they want to take on additional risk for a borrower that is current on their payments?  So, looking at this from a purely business-decision view, HARP is not likely to benefit those who need it most. 

In all of these “solutions” to the debt crisis, what has remained absent and sadly will most likely continue to be absent is any significant push to compel lenders to reduce principal balances to enable borrowers to keep their homes. Common sense would suggest that if a lender is going to recover only 50% of the principal through a short sale or a foreclosure, they would be better off cutting the principal balance by 25% and keeping the borrower in their home. Unfortunately, common sense has never prevailed. HARP will effectively shift the refinanced liability to the taxpayer.  Similarly, many States are using stimilus money, ie: taxpayer money, to help homeowners pay their loans.  Nothing forces the lenders to actually bear the cost of a home-saving solution. 

While the revised program seeks to lower mortgage payments for underwater homeowners, the program does nothing to address the core problem — owing more than the home is worth. Though borrowers may save hundreds of dollars a month in lower payments by refinancing, they routinely owe tens of thousands of dollars more than their homes are worth, even after receiving aid. “In most cases people would probably be better off walking,” said economist Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research.

If you are a California property owner, consider our $200 Attorney Consult program that will help you determine all of your options and choose the best strategy to enable you to move forward as intact as possible.  To learn more, contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or call us at 916 966-2260. 

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every persons situation is different. If you are upside-down on your loan(s), especially if you’re facing a lender lawsuit, get competent legal advice in your State immediately so that you can determine your best options.

It’s hard to believe but it has been one year since news of the “robo-signer” scandal broke.  In their rush to foreclose defaulted loans, lenders were filing false foreclosure notices and fraudulent legal actions.  In the immediate aftermath, some lenders stopped foreclosing but the pace soon picked up when lenders realized that Washington wasn’t going to do anything about it.  Since then, the only sanction has been lawsuits by the Attorney Generals of several States against the lenders. Settlement negotiations have been going on for six months with no resolution in sight since lenders are demanding immunity from future prosecution.

Throughout all of this, despite all the hype, there remains no effective help for upside down homeowners who are frustrated and angry at unfulfilled promises such as the HAMP Program which remains mostly ineffective at reducing loan costs to overwhelmed debtors.  Instead, lenders seem to prefer foreclosure even if that results in less of a money recovery for their investors. As reported on foreclosureradar.com, Notice of Default filings in California are up 69.5%. In Sacramento, August NOD’s were up 85% over July.  Much of this increase is Bank of America. Market watcher Dataquick.com reported that BofA foreclosure filings in California increased 200% between July and August!

As I have written before, I have concern with BofA’s survivability as they continue to deal with the incredible losses from their Countrywide purchase. In July BofA reported an $8 billion 2nd quarter loss and there’s billions more of losses yet to go.  A BofA spokesman stated that even this increase may not be enough. BofA appears committed to forcing as much bad debt off their books as they can as quickly as they can.  Meanwhile, lawsuits continue to mount.  Insurance giant, AIG, filed a $10 billion lawsuit against BofA in early September; and FNMA is reportedly about to file a $20 billion plus lawsuita against BofA and others.

What all of this means is that we’re in for more troubling financial times as lenders try to rebound from the deep recession caused by the collapse of the real estate bubble. Added to this is continued economic instability in California, nationally, and in fact world-wide all of which is causing buyers and investors to question whether now is the time to buy.  California Association of Realtors (CAR) is predicting that sales will remain flat through 2011 and that property prices will fall 4%. They further project a small, less than 2%, price growth in 2012.  CAR’s chief economist, Leslie Appleton-Young, stated: “the best decription of what can be expected next year is the market will be bouncing along the bottom.” … “One of the biggest uncertainties in today’s market is what are the negative equity homeowners going to do going forward and how big a percentage will end up in the foreclosure process”.

So the bottom line is insecurity on the economy and continued efforts by lenders to clear defaulted loans off their books.  This means more short sales, more foreclosures and more REO properties.  For some, this will spell an opportunity to acquire good properties at a low price with cheap loans.  For others, it will be wait and see how low the markets go.  None of this is good news for upside down owners hoping to save their homes.  Looking forward to a 2012 Presidential election years, it is not at all likely that any further relief for homeowners can be expected befor2 2013.

If you are an upside down homeowner struggling to hang on, don’t give up all hope.  Keep trying for that Loan Modification. Although most will not get one, many loans are getting modified. Just keep pushing.  If you can’t hold on, then get good legal, finance, and real estate advice on your options.  If you are a California property owner, consider our $200 Attorney Consult program that will help you determine all of your options and choose the best strategy to enable you to move forward as intact as possible.  To learn more, contact me at sjbeede@bpelaw.com or call us at 916 966-2260.

The Treasury Department has released the results of its second-quarter assessment of the 10 largest servicers participating in the government’s Making Home Affordable program.  As resported in DSNews.com, Officials say they will continue to withhold program incentives owed to Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase. The two were determined to need “substantial improvement” in key areas of borrower outreach, borrower evaluations, and program reporting, although Treasury did note that “some improvements have been made” by the companies since its previous assessment.

BofA and JPMorgan received the same score last quarter, as did Wells Fargo, but Wells Fargo has now elevated its grade to needing “moderate improvement” and with the movement has reopened the flow of incentive payments for loss mitigation actions completed under the Making Home Affordable umbrella. American Home Mortgage Servicing, CitiMortgage, Ocwen Loan Servicing, and Select Portfolio Servicing also received the “moderate improvement” rating.  Three servicers have been identified as needing only “minor improvement” – GMAC Mortgage, Litton Loan Servicing, and OneWest Bank. Treasury’s previous quarterly assessment put no servicers in this category, which is the highest on the three-level scale.

While we have all looked hopefully to an improving real estate market as 2011 progressed, it is now fairly clear that we’re in for continued uncertainty as financial concerns continue to rock the economy.

On the International level, the downgrade last week of the United States’ credit rating by Standard & Poor’s has triggered a dramatic sell-off in the stock market and raising the borrowing costs for the government. This means the cost of US Treasury bonds will climb and can be expected to push up real estate interest rates for new loans. Those borrowers with adjustable loans tied to Treasury rates can expect similar increases. The biggest fear is that this, combined with instability with European financial markets, will cause businesses to continue holding onto cash instead of investing in new jobs. Business confidence and job growth is needed to lift us out of this recession and avoid further declines.

On the National level, real estate foreclosure rates continue to climb. Lender Processing Servcice reports that 217,000 new foreclosures were started in June and that 4.1 million loans are now either in foreclosure or 90+ days delinquent. This is a 13% increase from last year. What this indicates is that efforts to assist upside-down borrowers continue to fail. Plus, we’re seeing an increase of defaults among borrowers who have interest-only loans which will convert to full-pay in 2012. Without an option to modify, refinance, or sell, many such borrowers are deciding to take the hit now. The key to making such a decision is knowing whether the borrower will be at risk of a lender lawsuit for recourse after a foreclosure or shaort-sale. BPE Law’s consult services for upside-down borrowers can answer these questions for California property owners.

California remains in disarray as borrowers, lenders, and agents still try to make sense of the recently passed SB458 which amended California Civil Code Section 580e. By barring junior lenders from either deficiancy recourse or contribution, the legislature suddenly made short sales an all or nothing situation. All lenders owe their investors a fiduciary duty to try to recover as much as reasonably possible. First lenders generally make more money from a short sale than they would from a foreclosure so, this change has not substantially affected them. But junior lenders now must weigh the nominal amount offered them by a first lender (typically $3,000) against what they might recover by suing the borrower for deficiency after the first lender forecloses. Unless the borrower is clearly a Bankruptcy candidate, junior lenders will increasingly find foreclosure more attractive than short sale. For Realtors, this means further declines in short sale closing rates, more REO properties, and continued market decline.

We have a long way to go and many hurdles to cross before we reach any kind of certainty. Huge lawsuits are being filed against lenders by their investors, most recdently AIG’s $10 billion suit last week against BofA. Meanwhile, the proposed Settlement of the Attorneys General lawsuits against lenders arising from the “robo-signer” scam remains in limbo. The battle-ground there is demands that lenders modify loans and cut principal balances. The lenders refuse… or at least refuse to agree to government-imposed loan changes. For upside-down borrowers, there is no indication that anything transpiring in the economy or in the courts will bring any more hope for homeowners nor will there be any government bailout.

In the long run, as with past recessions, it will take inspiring and effective political leadership to move us forward. Today’s political infighting in Washington and in the States - especially California - has not produced any sense of confidence in the US or the World that we have the political will to make the hard decisions necessary to put our economy on a path to recovery. Any path will be painful. How that pain is balanced will remain the battle-ground.

The FTC’s Mortgage Assistance Relief (MARS) Rule which took full effect on January 1, 2011 is designed to help distressed homeowners avoid mortgage relief scams through a combination of: 1) an Advance Fee Ban; 2) required Disclosures; and 3) a Prohibition against certain types of claims. See my previous Blog for details: Mars Rules Hope to Block Loan Scams.

Although targeted at Loan Modification Companies, The Rule is causing great concern for Realtors and other real estate professionals handling short sales.  Since short sales in part seek to provide debtors with relief from deficiency loan liability, the challenge has been how to do their job effectively without risk of liability for violating the MARS Rule in short-sale negotiations where they often discuss their clients’ delinquent mortgage situations, or refer clients to companies that specialize in loan workouts.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) requested that the FTC carve out disclosure exemptions for home sales but that request has been denied. The result is Realtors handling short sales could be exposed to fines of up to $11,000 per day for non-compliance with the Rule.  To facilitate compliance, the California Association of Realtors (CAR) has created four new Disclosures to be used in short sales each of which is formatted with the type sizes and emphasis required under the Rule. Two of these concern short sales and two concern notice to tenants concerning post-foreclosure occupancy rights.  These new Disclosures are:

     (1)   Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Short Sale Negotiation Notice;

    (2)   Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Offer of Mortgage Relief Notice;

    (3)   Notice of Termination of Tenancy within One Year after Foreclosure (Giving Tenant At Least 90 Days to Vacate)

    (4)   Additional Information Regarding Termination of Tenancy within One Year After Foreclosure Giving Tenant Less Than 90 Days to Vacate).

As with any new law, the enforcement and applicability of the MARS Rule may change as courts ultimately interpret its full legal effect.  Meanwhile it is critical that all people involved in real estate transactions be aware of and comply the Rule’s requirements. If you are a Realtor, be sure to stay current with the legal forms being provided by your State Association of Realtors.  We will also seek to keep you informed in these periodic Blog postings.

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every person’s situation is different. If you are a real estate professional involved with short sales or in anyway providing communication or advice to upside-down owners, be sure to get competent legal advice in your State immediately before giving any advice.

If you have specific questions about dealing with upside down loans or real estate, feel free to contact us at sjbeede@bpelaw.com.  We offer a $200 flat fee attorney consultation to review your situation and help you evaluate and choose the best opportunities. This can be done in person or by phone. If interested, please call us at 916-966-2260.

In November, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission passed a rule that bans providers of mortgage foreclosure rescue and loan modification services from collecting fees until homeowners have a written offer from their lender or servicer that they decide is acceptable (FTC MARS Rule).  Called the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) Rule, it is designed to protect distressed homeowners from mortgage relief scams that have sprung up during the mortgage crisis. Bogus operations falsely claim that, for a fee, they will negotiate with the consumer’s mortgage lender or servicer to obtain a loan modification, a short sale, or other relief from foreclosure. Many of these operations pretend to be affiliated with the government and government housing assistance programs.

The MARS Rule has three key components:

1.   Advance fee ban - Under this provision, mortgage relief companies may not collect any fees until they have provided consumers with a written offer from their lender or servicer that the consumer decides is acceptable, and a written document from the lender or servicer describing the key changes to the mortgage that would result if the consumer accepts the offer. The companies also must remind consumers of their right to reject the offer without any charge.

2.   Disclosures - The Rule requires mortgage relief companies to disclose key information to consumers to protect them from being misled and to help them make better informed purchasing decisions. In their advertising and in communications directed at individual consumers (such as telemarketing calls), the companies must disclose that:

    (a)  They are not associated with the government, and their services have not been approved by the government or the consumer’s lender;

   (b)  the lender may not agree to change the consumer’s loan; and

   (c)  if companies tell consumers to stop paying their mortgage, they must also tell them that they could lose their home and damage their credit rating.

Companies also must explain in their communications to consumers that they can stop doing business with the company at any time, can accept or reject any offer the company obtains from the lender or servicer, and, if they reject the offer, they don’t have to pay the company’s fee. The companies also must disclose the amount of the fee.

3.   Prohibited claims - The MARS Rule prohibits mortgage relief companies from making any false or misleading claims about their services, including claims about:

   (a)  the likelihood of consumers getting the results they seek;

   (b)  the company’s affiliation with government or private entities;

   (c)  the consumer’s payment and other mortgage obligations;

   (d)  the company’s refund and cancellation policies;

   (e)  whether the company has performed the services it promised;

   (f)  whether the company will provide legal representation to consumers;

   (g)  the availability or cost of any alternative to for-profit mortgage assistance relief services;

   (h)  the amount of money a consumer will save by using their services; or

   (i)  the cost of the services.

In addition, the rule bars mortgage relief companies from telling consumers to stop communicating with their lenders or servicers. Companies also must have reliable evidence to back up any claims they make about the benefits, performance, or effectiveness of the services they provide.

All provisions of the rule except the advance-fee ban become effective December 29, 2010. The advance-fee ban provisions became effective January 31, 2011.

Most people in the real estate and lending community applaud this effort to protect already upside-down homeowners from predators promising help but who in reality are only out to take their money. However, passing a Rule is one thing, understanding and implementing it is another. In my next Article I’ll discuss the challenges being faced by the Real Estate industry to comply.

The information presented in this Article is not to be taken as legal advice. Every person’s situation is different. If you are upside-down on your loan(s), or if you are being tempted by companies promising to get you a loan modification and enable you avoid foreclosure, get competent legal advice in your State immediately before giving them any money up front.

If you have specific questions about your upside down loans or real estate, feel free to contact us at sjbeede@bpelaw.com.  We offer a $200 flat fee attorney consultation to review your situation and help you evaluate and choose the best opportunities. This can be done in person or by phone. If interested, please call us at 916-966-2260.